Imagen de Google Jackets

Correspondence, between the late Commodore Stephen Decatur and Commodore James Barron, which led to the unfortunate meeting of the twenty-second of March

Por: Colaborador(es): Tipo de material: TextoIdioma: en Editor: Salt Lake City, UT : Project Gutenberg, 2010Descripción: 1 online resource : multiple file formatsTipo de contenido:
  • text
Tipo de medio:
  • computer
Tipo de soporte:
  • online resource
Tema(s): Clasificación LoC:
  • E300
Recursos en línea: Créditos de producción:
  • Produced by Ernest Schaal and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net (This file was produced from images generously made available by The Internet Archive/American Libraries.)
Resumen: "Correspondence, between the late Commodore Stephen Decatur and Commodore James Barron, which led to the unfortunate meeting of the Twenty Second of March" is a historical account published in the early 19th century. The book contains an exchange of letters between two notable naval officers, Stephen Decatur and James Barron, focusing on a personal dispute that ultimately escalated into a duel. The correspondence reveals the nature of their conflict, which revolves around accusations, perceived insults, and honor, indicative of the strict codes of conduct and personal honor that characterized the military ethos of the time. In the book, the letters chronicle the progression of the animosity between Decatur and Barron, stemming from a series of misunderstandings and accusations regarding character and professional conduct. The correspondence highlights initial inquiries about alleged insults, which escalate into serious charges of betrayal and treachery. As tension builds, both men exchange pointed retorts, revealing deep-seated grievances and justifications for their mutual contempt. Ultimately, the correspondence culminates in a challenge to a duel, illustrating the period's complex interplay of honor among military officers. Through these letters, the reader gains insight into personal rivalries and the stringent social codes that governed honor and reputation in early American naval history. (This is an automatically generated summary.)
Etiquetas de esta biblioteca: No hay etiquetas de esta biblioteca para este título. Ingresar para agregar etiquetas.
Valoración
    Valoración media: 0.0 (0 votos)
No hay ítems correspondientes a este registro

Release date is 2010-11-22

Produced by Ernest Schaal and the Online Distributed
Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net (This file was
produced from images generously made available by The
Internet Archive/American Libraries.)

"Correspondence, between the late Commodore Stephen Decatur and Commodore James Barron, which led to the unfortunate meeting of the Twenty Second of March" is a historical account published in the early 19th century. The book contains an exchange of letters between two notable naval officers, Stephen Decatur and James Barron, focusing on a personal dispute that ultimately escalated into a duel. The correspondence reveals the nature of their conflict, which revolves around accusations, perceived insults, and honor, indicative of the strict codes of conduct and personal honor that characterized the military ethos of the time. In the book, the letters chronicle the progression of the animosity between Decatur and Barron, stemming from a series of misunderstandings and accusations regarding character and professional conduct. The correspondence highlights initial inquiries about alleged insults, which escalate into serious charges of betrayal and treachery. As tension builds, both men exchange pointed retorts, revealing deep-seated grievances and justifications for their mutual contempt. Ultimately, the correspondence culminates in a challenge to a duel, illustrating the period's complex interplay of honor among military officers. Through these letters, the reader gains insight into personal rivalries and the stringent social codes that governed honor and reputation in early American naval history. (This is an automatically generated summary.)

Original publication data not identified

No hay comentarios en este titulo.

para colocar un comentario.