The genuine tryal of Dr. Nosmoth, a physician in Pekin
Anonymous
The genuine tryal of Dr. Nosmoth, a physician in Pekin - 1 online resource : multiple file formats
Dr. Nosmoth = Thomas Thompson M.D.; Mandarin Tonwin = Thomas Winnington. On Dr. Thompson's treatment of the case of T. Winnington. Release date is 2025-04-12
Matthew Everett and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net (This file was produced from images generously made available by The Internet Archive) Matthew Everett and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net (This file was produced from images generously made available by The Internet Archive)
"The genuine tryal of Dr. Nosmoth, a physician in Pekin : For the murder of the…" is a satirical legal drama published in the mid-18th century. Presented as the official shorthand account of a sensational trial at the imperial Chinese court, the book offers a mock-transcript of the proceedings against Dr. Nosmoth, accused of causing the death of the esteemed Mandarin Tonwin. Though presented with the formal trappings of a serious historical document, the work is a clear parody of both legal procedure and medical practice of its era, drawing on contemporary debates in England. The likely topic centers on a physician’s responsibility in the death of a prominent patient, set against a backdrop of courtly intrigue and exaggerated judicial process. The book begins by describing the highly regulated practice of medicine in China, emphasizing rigorous ethics and strict government oversight. Dr. Nosmoth stands accused of having killed Mandarin Tonwin, the emperor’s treasurer, by reckless medical practice—namely excessive bleeding and purging, allegedly encouraged by outdated or self-serving ideas. The trial unfolds with arguments between the emperor’s council and the defense, lampooning the inflexibility and even absurdity of both the medical establishment and judicial systems. Satirical exchanges highlight the perils of following rigid doctrines over practical adaptation. Ultimately, though the court tries Dr. Nosmoth and delivers a sentence (deliberately left unpublished), the text ends as a cautionary, comedic reflection on the dangers of medical dogmatism and professional jealousy, as well as a jab at legal pomp and bureaucracy. (This is an automatically generated summary.)
94840372
Satire, English -- Early works to 1800 Winnington, Thomas, 1696-1746 Thompson, Thomas, -1763
PR R
The genuine tryal of Dr. Nosmoth, a physician in Pekin - 1 online resource : multiple file formats
Dr. Nosmoth = Thomas Thompson M.D.; Mandarin Tonwin = Thomas Winnington. On Dr. Thompson's treatment of the case of T. Winnington. Release date is 2025-04-12
Matthew Everett and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net (This file was produced from images generously made available by The Internet Archive) Matthew Everett and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net (This file was produced from images generously made available by The Internet Archive)
"The genuine tryal of Dr. Nosmoth, a physician in Pekin : For the murder of the…" is a satirical legal drama published in the mid-18th century. Presented as the official shorthand account of a sensational trial at the imperial Chinese court, the book offers a mock-transcript of the proceedings against Dr. Nosmoth, accused of causing the death of the esteemed Mandarin Tonwin. Though presented with the formal trappings of a serious historical document, the work is a clear parody of both legal procedure and medical practice of its era, drawing on contemporary debates in England. The likely topic centers on a physician’s responsibility in the death of a prominent patient, set against a backdrop of courtly intrigue and exaggerated judicial process. The book begins by describing the highly regulated practice of medicine in China, emphasizing rigorous ethics and strict government oversight. Dr. Nosmoth stands accused of having killed Mandarin Tonwin, the emperor’s treasurer, by reckless medical practice—namely excessive bleeding and purging, allegedly encouraged by outdated or self-serving ideas. The trial unfolds with arguments between the emperor’s council and the defense, lampooning the inflexibility and even absurdity of both the medical establishment and judicial systems. Satirical exchanges highlight the perils of following rigid doctrines over practical adaptation. Ultimately, though the court tries Dr. Nosmoth and delivers a sentence (deliberately left unpublished), the text ends as a cautionary, comedic reflection on the dangers of medical dogmatism and professional jealousy, as well as a jab at legal pomp and bureaucracy. (This is an automatically generated summary.)
94840372
Satire, English -- Early works to 1800 Winnington, Thomas, 1696-1746 Thompson, Thomas, -1763
PR R