Les incertitudes de l'heure présente
Le Bon, Gustave, 1841-1931
Les incertitudes de l'heure présente - 1 online resource : multiple file formats
Release date is 2026-01-19
Laurent Vogel (This book was produced from scanned images of public domain material from the Google Books project.) Laurent Vogel (This book was produced from scanned images of public domain material from the Google Books project.)
"Les incertitudes de l'heure présente" by Gustave Le Bon is a collection of political and social reflections written in the early 20th century. It probes how affective and mystical forces, rather than rational logic, drive nations’ conduct in war, politics, morality, religion, and public life, especially in the unstable aftermath of the Great War. The work cautions that mass beliefs, prestige, and striking formulas outweigh reason, and it warns against the illusions of disarmament, facile internationalism, and revolutionary extremism.
The opening of this work sets out a core tension between modern scientific-economic necessities and the ancestral passions that actually steer peoples, then applies this lens to contemporary politics. It argues that governments must rule through prevailing beliefs, not abstract logic; that formulas and prestige move crowds; and that psychological errors, not just material factors, bred Europe’s chaos. It surveys likely future conflicts and hegemonic rivalries, doubts the feasibility of disarmament, and treats revolutions as hope-fueled but destructive movements that typically end in dictatorship and a return of old constraints. It portrays international relations as driven by interest and distrust, with economic forces sovereign, treaties and congresses often masking power plays, alliances fragile, and a force-less League of Nations illusory. It then links social order to respect for law, authority, and stable moral habits, insisting that right requires force and that effective morality springs from discipline more than religion or pure reason. Finally, it condemns extremism, socialism, syndicalism, and especially communism as envy-fueled and ruinous, using Russia as a cautionary case before the excerpt breaks off. (This is an automatically generated summary.)
24007137
Political science Aphorisms and apothegms
PQ
Les incertitudes de l'heure présente - 1 online resource : multiple file formats
Release date is 2026-01-19
Laurent Vogel (This book was produced from scanned images of public domain material from the Google Books project.) Laurent Vogel (This book was produced from scanned images of public domain material from the Google Books project.)
"Les incertitudes de l'heure présente" by Gustave Le Bon is a collection of political and social reflections written in the early 20th century. It probes how affective and mystical forces, rather than rational logic, drive nations’ conduct in war, politics, morality, religion, and public life, especially in the unstable aftermath of the Great War. The work cautions that mass beliefs, prestige, and striking formulas outweigh reason, and it warns against the illusions of disarmament, facile internationalism, and revolutionary extremism.
The opening of this work sets out a core tension between modern scientific-economic necessities and the ancestral passions that actually steer peoples, then applies this lens to contemporary politics. It argues that governments must rule through prevailing beliefs, not abstract logic; that formulas and prestige move crowds; and that psychological errors, not just material factors, bred Europe’s chaos. It surveys likely future conflicts and hegemonic rivalries, doubts the feasibility of disarmament, and treats revolutions as hope-fueled but destructive movements that typically end in dictatorship and a return of old constraints. It portrays international relations as driven by interest and distrust, with economic forces sovereign, treaties and congresses often masking power plays, alliances fragile, and a force-less League of Nations illusory. It then links social order to respect for law, authority, and stable moral habits, insisting that right requires force and that effective morality springs from discipline more than religion or pure reason. Finally, it condemns extremism, socialism, syndicalism, and especially communism as envy-fueled and ruinous, using Russia as a cautionary case before the excerpt breaks off. (This is an automatically generated summary.)
24007137
Political science Aphorisms and apothegms
PQ