Imagen de Google Jackets

Ancient rhetoric and poetic

Por: Tipo de material: TextoIdioma: en Editor: Salt Lake City, UT : Project Gutenberg, 2025Descripción: 1 online resource : multiple file formatsTipo de contenido:
  • text
Tipo de medio:
  • computer
Tipo de soporte:
  • online resource
Tema(s): Clasificación LoC:
  • PA
Recursos en línea: Créditos de producción:
  • Tor Martin Kristiansen, Stephen Hutcheson and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net
Resumen: "Ancient Rhetoric and Poetic: Interpreted from Representative Works" by Charles Sears Baldwin is a scholarly treatise written in the early 20th century. It surveys classical theories of rhetoric and poetics through representative authors to recover practical principles of composition for modern readers. The work argues for a twofold view of composition—rhetoric as public, logical persuasion and poetic as imaginative movement—while tracing how ancient practice informs medieval pedagogy and Renaissance criticism. The opening of the book sets out the author’s purpose and method in a preface: to let figures like Aristotle, Cicero, Quintilian, Dionysius of Halicarnassus, and the author of “On the Sublime” speak for themselves, with a strict focus on composition and a deliberate exclusion of metrics. Chapter I distinguishes rhetoric from poetic not by verse versus prose, but by the kind of movement—idea-to-idea for rhetoric versus image-to-image for poetic—while acknowledging shared stylistic resources and emphasizing the pedagogical value of the distinction. Chapter II then begins a sustained reading of Aristotle’s Rhetoric: Book I defines rhetoric as discerning the available means of persuasion (with the enthymeme as its chief instrument) and maps deliberative, forensic, and occasional speech with their core topics. Book II shifts to the audience, analyzing emotions and character types to guide ethical adaptation. Book III turns to the speech itself—diction, rhythm, the periodic sentence, delivery, and the traditional parts—arguing that prose should be rhythmical but not metrical, and that vivid metaphor, energetic presentation, and apt arrangement make ideas act “before the eyes.” (This is an automatically generated summary.)
Etiquetas de esta biblioteca: No hay etiquetas de esta biblioteca para este título. Ingresar para agregar etiquetas.
Valoración
    Valoración media: 0.0 (0 votos)
No hay ítems correspondientes a este registro

Release date is 2025-08-19

Tor Martin Kristiansen, Stephen Hutcheson and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net

"Ancient Rhetoric and Poetic: Interpreted from Representative Works" by Charles Sears Baldwin is a scholarly treatise written in the early 20th century. It surveys classical theories of rhetoric and poetics through representative authors to recover practical principles of composition for modern readers. The work argues for a twofold view of composition—rhetoric as public, logical persuasion and poetic as imaginative movement—while tracing how ancient practice informs medieval pedagogy and Renaissance criticism. The opening of the book sets out the author’s purpose and method in a preface: to let figures like Aristotle, Cicero, Quintilian, Dionysius of Halicarnassus, and the author of “On the Sublime” speak for themselves, with a strict focus on composition and a deliberate exclusion of metrics. Chapter I distinguishes rhetoric from poetic not by verse versus prose, but by the kind of movement—idea-to-idea for rhetoric versus image-to-image for poetic—while acknowledging shared stylistic resources and emphasizing the pedagogical value of the distinction. Chapter II then begins a sustained reading of Aristotle’s Rhetoric: Book I defines rhetoric as discerning the available means of persuasion (with the enthymeme as its chief instrument) and maps deliberative, forensic, and occasional speech with their core topics. Book II shifts to the audience, analyzing emotions and character types to guide ethical adaptation. Book III turns to the speech itself—diction, rhythm, the periodic sentence, delivery, and the traditional parts—arguing that prose should be rhythmical but not metrical, and that vivid metaphor, energetic presentation, and apt arrangement make ideas act “before the eyes.” (This is an automatically generated summary.)

Originally published: Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith, 1924

No hay comentarios en este titulo.

para colocar un comentario.