02997cam a22003493u 4500 77112 UtSlPG 20260610134803.0 m cr n 260607r20251911utu|||||o|||||||||||||| d 12008151 UtSlPG fr iso639-1 BD Faguet, Émile, 1847-1916 Les préjugés nécessaires Salt Lake City, UT : Project Gutenberg, 2025 1 online resource : multiple file formats text txt rdacontent computer c rdamedia online resource cr rdacarrier Release date is 2025-10-23 L'animal social -- L'amour de la vie -- Le libre arbitre -- La morale -- Les religions -- La vie future -- La Némésis -- La réversibilité des fautes -- Le culte de la force -- L'aristocratie -- Le mariage -- La propriété -- Le Ama nescire -- Luttes et transformations -- Les préjugés nécessaires. Laurent Vogel (This file was produced from images generously made available by the Bibliothèque nationale de France (BnF/Gallica)) Les préjugés nécessaires by Émile Faguet is a philosophical treatise written in the early 20th century. It examines how societies are built and held together by “necessary prejudices”—beliefs people adopt less from proof than from social need. Arguing that humans are naturally familial and only reluctantly social, it claims war both creates and sustains society, forging civic cohesion and recasting instincts. The work appears set to analyze core beliefs (such as love of life and free will) as instruments that align individuals with collective survival. The opening of this treatise questions whether humans are innately social, comparing us with solitary, social, and gregarious animals and concluding we most resemble the gregarious. It traces a path from prolonged childrearing to family, sedentarism, domestication, and agriculture, then argues that true society arose not from the family but from war driven by population pressure, which necessitated defensive coalitions, laws, and permanent states that elevate martial virtues. Faguet then defines “necessary prejudices” and illustrates two: love of life, which society redirects from personal impulse to patriotic self-sacrifice, and free will, treated as a probable illusion yet a socially imposed creed that grounds responsibility, punishment, remorse, and conversion. The section closes by canvassing critiques of volition (Spinoza, Schopenhauer, Nietzsche, Ribot) while explaining why belief in freedom persists because society requires it. (This is an automatically generated summary.) Originally published: Paris: Société française d'imprimerie et de librairie, 1911 Ethics Life https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k81311b https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/77112 117834 117834