03284cam a22003253u 450000100060000000300070000600500170001300600020003000700050003200800410003704000110007804100170008905000070010610000350011324500810014826400510022930000470028033600260032733700260035333800360037950000310041550801160044652021670056253400550272965300090278470000510279385600520284485600430289699900190293977846UtSlPG20260610134814.0mcr n260607r20261912utu|||||o|||||||||||||| d aUtSlPG 7afr2iso639-1 4aDT1 aDelafosse, Maurice,d1870-192610aHaut-Sénégal-Niger (Soudan français), Tome 3 (de 3): les civilisations 1aSalt Lake City, UT :bProject Gutenberg,c2026 a1 online resource :bmultiple file formats atextbtxt2rdacontent acomputerbc2rdamedia aonline resourcebcr2rdacarrier aRelease date is 2026-02-03 aGalo Flordelis (This file was produced from images generously made available by the HathiTrust Digital Library) a"Haut-Sénégal-Niger (Soudan français), Tome 3 (de 3): les civilisations" by Maurice Delafosse is a scholarly ethnographic study written in the early 20th century. It surveys the civilizations of the French Soudan through their customary institutions—civil, social, political, and religious—with special attention to land tenure, property, family organization, and inheritance. The volume contrasts indigenous customary law with Islamic (Maliki) principles and French administrative practice, aiming to present the underlying spirit of local customs rather than a rigid code. The opening of the volume defines “civilization” broadly and argues that Sudanese societies possess coherent systems of custom worth systematic study, while noting that Islamic law is only partially adopted and that codifying customs would be misleading. Delafosse sets a method: avoid forcing European legal terms onto indigenous notions and extract guiding principles instead. He then outlines land tenure among sedentary and nomadic groups: all land has an owner (the community or its chief as administrator), families hold usufruct rights to cultivate, alienation of soil is rare and collective consent is required, and a public domain (waterways, paths, markets, sacred spaces) carries shared obligations. He contrasts this with Maliki law, which can recognize private ownership from first occupation, but notes its limited local application; he also cautions colonial authorities about concessions that ignore existing rights. Moving to movable property, he states that the products of labor (crops, buildings, tools, herds) are true private or collective property, details family property and administration, women’s parallel rights of possession, and practical rules for marks of ownership, found goods, and stray animals. Finally, he sketches succession: general rules for heirs and widows, limits on testaments, and three main systems—uterine (maternal-line), consanguine (paternal-line), and patriarchal—often with the patriarchal rule governing family property even where private estates follow other logics. (This is an automatically generated summary.) pOriginally published:cParis: Émile Larose, 1912 aMali1 aClozel, F.-J.q(François-Joseph),d1860-19184 uhttps://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/00084695740uhttps://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/77846 c118566d118566