03088cam a22003373u 4500 77888 UtSlPG 20260610134814.0 m cr n 260607r20261911utu|||||o|||||||||||||| d 11018488 UtSlPG de iso639-1 BF Kemmerich, Max, 1876-1932 Prophezeiungen Salt Lake City, UT : Project Gutenberg, 2026 1 online resource : multiple file formats text txt rdacontent computer c rdamedia online resource cr rdacarrier Release date is 2026-02-08 Peter Becker, Martin Oswald and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net (This file was produced from images generously made available by The Internet Archive) "Prophezeiungen" by Max Kemmerich is a historical‑scientific treatise written in the early 20th century. The work argues that genuine prophecy—understood as temporal clairvoyance—exists and can be demonstrated, not by credulity, but by combining probability theory with rigorously vetted historical cases. It positions itself as anti‑dogmatic and non‑religious, challenging both materialist skepticism and mystical overreach. The opening of the book presents editorial notes, a forthright foreword, and an introduction that lays out the author’s method and stance: he began as a skeptic, claims to have been convinced by evidence, and aims to elevate age‑old belief to demonstrable knowledge through the calculus of probability applied to well‑attested records. He rebukes the reflex of declaring phenomena “impossible,” catalogs famous scientific misjudgments to caution against dogma, and insists that facts outrank theories. He distances himself from fortune‑telling and church apologetics, anticipates ridicule, justifies publishing for a broad audience, and invites rigorous doubt rather than faith. The first chapter then starts assembling cases from antiquity: it largely brackets religious prophecies but highlights Hebrew predictions about dispersion, exile to Babylon, return, and influence among nations; it dismisses New Testament and hagiographic material as text‑critically unreliable, favoring profane sources. Moving to classical oracles, it critiques double‑edged answers (Croesus, Pyrrhus) yet defends that Delphic revelations could be specific, citing Thucydides on the “Dorian war” and plague, and describing the Pythia’s trance. It then turns to Roman material around Caesar’s assassination, and uses these to segue into a focused discussion of veridical dreams and telepathic impressions, offering contemporary testimonies as preliminary evidence. (This is an automatically generated summary.) Originally published: München: Albert Langen, 1911 Superstition Prophecies https://archive.org/details/prophezeiungenal00kemm/page/n5 https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/77888 118608 118608