02957cam a22003853u 450000100060000000300070000600500170001300600020003000700050003200800410003704000110007804100170008905000070010610000360011324502090014924602100035826400510056830000470061933600260066633700260069233800360071850000310075450800710078552013200085653400450217665300380222165300420225965300330230165300290233465300530236365300610241670000340247785600430251199900170255454269UtSlPG20260610134242.0mcr n260607r2017||||utu|||||o|||||||||||||| d  aUtSlPG 7aen2iso639-1 4aBX1 aMayow, Mayow Wynell,d1810-189512aA Letter to the Rev. William Maskell, A.M. :bHow far the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council commits the Church of England by its decision, even allowing it to have jurisdiction in points of doctrine1 aA Letter to the Reverend William Maskell, A.M.
How far the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council commits the Church of England by its decision, even allowing it to have jurisdiction in points of doctrine 1aSalt Lake City, UT :bProject Gutenberg,c2017  a1 online resource :bmultiple file formats  atextbtxt2rdacontent  acomputerbc2rdamedia  aonline resourcebcr2rdacarrier  aRelease date is 2017-03-02  aTranscribed from the 1850 William Pickering edition by David Price  a"A Letter to the Rev. William Maskell, A.M." by Mayow Wynell Mayow is a theological publication written in the mid-19th century, specifically around the 1850s. This book addresses a significant crisis within the Church of England regarding its doctrines and the authority of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council. It is primarily a letter that debates the implications of this authority on matters of church doctrine, particularly focusing on baptismal regeneration.  In the letter, Mayow expresses his concerns regarding the decisions made by the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, arguing that they may not necessarily commit the Church of England to heresy despite the ambiguity of the language within its formularies. He contends that while the court may have the authority to interpret church law, this does not automatically mean that the Church’s true stance is heretical. Throughout, he emphasizes the importance of the Church's intentions and the necessity for it to assert its doctrines clearly to avoid misinterpretation and the perception of heresy. Mayow also proposes actionable steps for the Church to maintain its integrity amidst these challenges, advocating for a gathering to petition for a convocation to consider these urgent matters. (This is an automatically generated summary.)  nOriginal publication data not identified  aChurch and state -- Great Britain  aChurch and state -- Church of England  aBaptism -- Church of England  aGorham, George Cornelius  aGreat Britain. Privy Council. Judicial Committee  aEcclesiastical law -- England -- History -- 19th century1 aMaskell, William,d1814?-189040uhttps://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/54269  c95103d95103