000 02911cam a22003733u 4500
001 71562
003 UtSlPG
005 20260610134644.0
006 m
007 cr n
008 260607r20231911utu|||||o|||||||||||||| d
010 _a12015707
040 _aUtSlPG
041 7 _aen
_2iso639-1
050 4 _aBL
100 1 _aFarnell, Lewis Richard,
_d1856-1934
245 1 0 _aGreece and Babylon
264 1 _aSalt Lake City, UT :
_bProject Gutenberg,
_c2023
300 _a1 online resource :
_bmultiple file formats
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
500 _aRelease date is 2023-09-04
505 0 _aInaugural lecture -- Statement of the problem and the evidence -- Morphology of the compared religions -- Anthropomorphism and theriomorphism in Anatolia and the Mediterranean -- Predominance of the goddess -- The deities as nature-powers -- The deities as social-powers -- Religion and morality -- Purity a divine attribute -- Concept of divine power and ancient cosmogonies -- The religious temperament of the Eastern and Western peoples -- Eschatologic ideas of East and West -- Comparison of the ritual -- Summary of results.
508 _aan anonymous Project Gutenberg volunteer
520 _a"Greece and Babylon: A Comparative Sketch of Mesopotamian, Anatolian and Hellenic Religions" by Lewis R. Farnell is a scholarly historical account written in the early 20th century. This work delves into the religious systems of ancient Greece, Mesopotamia, and Anatolia, examining their similarities and differences in beliefs, rituals, and the evolution of deities. Farnell seeks to unpack the interconnections between these cultures, highlighting the complexities of their spiritual practices and the influence of one on another. The opening of the book serves as an inaugural lecture by Farnell as the first Wilde Lecturer in Natural and Comparative Religion, where he outlines his intended exploration of these ancient religions. He emphasizes the importance of establishing a methodological framework to investigate how Hellenic religion may have borrowed from or interacted with Mesopotamian and Anatolian beliefs. Farnell acknowledges the vastness of this subject, discusses the necessity of comparative study, and proposes a focus on specific elements like the nature of divinity, morality, and ritual practices across these cultures, setting the stage for a nuanced comparative analysis throughout the text. (This is an automatically generated summary.)
534 _pOriginally published:
_cEdinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1911
653 _aMythology, Greek
653 _aGreece -- Religion
653 _aAssyro-Babylonian religion
653 _aMythology, Assyro-Babylonian
856 4 _uhttps://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.87827
856 4 0 _uhttps://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/71562
999 _c112288
_d112288