000 03013cam a22003493u 4500
001 75845
003 UtSlPG
005 20260610134744.0
006 m
007 cr n
008 260607r20251746utu|||||o|||||||||||||| d
010 _a94840372
040 _aUtSlPG
041 7 _aen
_2iso639-1
050 4 _aPR
_aR
100 1 _aAnonymous
245 1 4 _aThe genuine tryal of Dr. Nosmoth, a physician in Pekin
264 1 _aSalt Lake City, UT :
_bProject Gutenberg,
_c2025
300 _a1 online resource :
_bmultiple file formats
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
500 _aDr. Nosmoth = Thomas Thompson M.D.; Mandarin Tonwin = Thomas Winnington. On Dr. Thompson's treatment of the case of T. Winnington.
500 _aRelease date is 2025-04-12
508 _aMatthew Everett and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net (This file was produced from images generously made available by The Internet Archive)
520 _a"The genuine tryal of Dr. Nosmoth, a physician in Pekin : For the murder of the…" is a satirical legal drama published in the mid-18th century. Presented as the official shorthand account of a sensational trial at the imperial Chinese court, the book offers a mock-transcript of the proceedings against Dr. Nosmoth, accused of causing the death of the esteemed Mandarin Tonwin. Though presented with the formal trappings of a serious historical document, the work is a clear parody of both legal procedure and medical practice of its era, drawing on contemporary debates in England. The likely topic centers on a physician’s responsibility in the death of a prominent patient, set against a backdrop of courtly intrigue and exaggerated judicial process. The book begins by describing the highly regulated practice of medicine in China, emphasizing rigorous ethics and strict government oversight. Dr. Nosmoth stands accused of having killed Mandarin Tonwin, the emperor’s treasurer, by reckless medical practice—namely excessive bleeding and purging, allegedly encouraged by outdated or self-serving ideas. The trial unfolds with arguments between the emperor’s council and the defense, lampooning the inflexibility and even absurdity of both the medical establishment and judicial systems. Satirical exchanges highlight the perils of following rigid doctrines over practical adaptation. Ultimately, though the court tries Dr. Nosmoth and delivers a sentence (deliberately left unpublished), the text ends as a cautionary, comedic reflection on the dangers of medical dogmatism and professional jealousy, as well as a jab at legal pomp and bureaucracy. (This is an automatically generated summary.)
534 _pOriginally published:
_cLondon: M. Cooper, 1746
653 _aSatire, English -- Early works to 1800
653 _aWinnington, Thomas, 1696-1746
653 _aThompson, Thomas, -1763
856 4 0 _uhttps://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/75845
999 _c116570
_d116570