000 03298cam a22003253u 4500
001 76229
003 UtSlPG
005 20260610134750.0
006 m
007 cr n
008 260607r20251780utu|||||o|||||||||||||| d
040 _aUtSlPG
041 7 _aen
_2iso639-1
050 4 _aPQ
100 1 _aFeijoo, Benito Jerónimo,
_d1676-1764
245 1 0 _aEssays, or discourses, vol. 4 (of 4)
264 1 _aSalt Lake City, UT :
_bProject Gutenberg,
_c2025
300 _a1 online resource :
_bmultiple file formats
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
500 _aRelease date is 2025-06-05
508 _aJosep Cols Canals and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net (This file was produced from images generously made available by The Internet Archive/American Libraries.)
520 _a"Essays, or discourses, vol. 4 (of 4) : Selected from the works of Feyjoo, and…." by Feyjoo is a collection of philosophical essays written in the late 18th century. The volume gathers short, argumentative pieces on natural philosophy, epistemology, and morals that challenge inherited Aristotelian doctrine and promote cautious, experiment‑based reasoning. Expect lively “paradoxes” that overturn common opinions about fire, air, water, and qualities, alongside reflections on the limits of human knowledge and the pretensions of learned display. It will appeal to readers of Enlightenment thought, history of science, and skeptical philosophy. The opening of the volume presents a table of contents and then launches into “Physical Paradoxes,” where the author argues from experiments that solar heat concentrated by burning‑glasses surpasses elemental fire, that air is naturally cold absent the sun’s influence, and that water tends toward solidity, not fluidity. He contends that so‑called “occult qualities” are no more obscure than familiar ones (magnetism versus heat), that united forces are not always stronger (citing thread and rope tests), and that variations in sunlight and warmth stem partly from sunspots; he explains why a burning‑glass works better in cold and why a flame’s cone is a forced shape due to air pressure. He then claims metals reside in plants (magnetic particles in ashes, “metallic vegetation,” and a bold conjecture linking the earth’s magnetism to ubiquitous iron), before beginning “On Sceptical Philosophy,” distinguishing prudent from extreme doubt, reappraising ancient skeptics, and defending a practical trust in “experimental” evidence against dream and delusion arguments. This opening culminates in the thesis that natural philosophy yields probability rather than demonstration, illustrating the point by showing how uncertain our definitions of species, genera, and even “man as a rational animal” remain, with doubts extending to animals’ sensation and plants’ sensitivity. (This is an automatically generated summary.)
534 _pOriginally published:
_cLondon: H. Payne, 1780
653 _aSpanish essays -- Translations into English
700 1 _aBrett, John,
_d-1785
856 4 _uhttps://archive.org/details/essaysordiscours04feij
856 4 0 _uhttps://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/76229
999 _c116954
_d116954