000 02956cam a22003613u 4500
001 76629
003 UtSlPG
005 20260610134756.0
006 m
007 cr n
008 260607r20251928utu|||||o|||||||||||||| d
010 _a28006294
040 _aUtSlPG
041 7 _aen
_2iso639-1
050 4 _aQ
100 1 _aSullivan, J. W. N.
_q(John William Navin),
_d1886-1937
245 1 0 _aGallio
264 1 _aSalt Lake City, UT :
_bProject Gutenberg,
_c2025
300 _a1 online resource :
_bmultiple file formats
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
490 1 _a[To-day and to-morrow series]
500 _aRelease date is 2025-08-03
508 _aProduced by Donald Cummings and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net (This book was produced from images made available by the HathiTrust Digital Library.)
520 _a"Gallio : or, The tyranny of science by J. W. N. Sullivan" is a philosophical essay of cultural criticism written in the early 20th century. The book examines the growing prestige of science and challenges its claim to define reality, especially where it sidelines art, morals, and spiritual experience. Its likely topic is the limits of scientific method and the need to recognize values, purpose, and imagination as central to human knowledge. The essay opens with the rise of scientific authority from Darwin to Einstein, noting how artists first resisted and then, after the War, often embraced a bleak materialism. It argues that modern physics—especially relativity—undermines the old “iron laws,” showing that scientific laws are mind-shaped selections from a world of “point-events,” and that science offers only partial, abstract descriptions of reality. Sullivan criticizes the fetish of measurement and the misuse of scientific prestige in fields like eugenics, crude psychoanalysis, and behaviourism, as well as the fallacy of “explaining by origins.” He urges humility before quantum mysteries and calls for richer abstractions, drawing on thinkers like Eddington and Whitehead to replace “substance” with “organism” and to reconnect space, time, memory, and expectation. Art—especially music—is presented as a mode of genuine knowledge that reveals possibilities of the spirit and anticipates human growth. The book closes by denying that science should tyrannize culture: its scope is limited, its laws are provisional and self-referential, and it is largely irrelevant to the deepest moral and spiritual concerns. (This is an automatically generated summary.)
534 _pOriginally published:
_cNew York: E. P. Dutton & Co., 1928
653 _aScience
653 _aScience -- Philosophy
830 0 _a[To-day and to-morrow series]
856 4 _uhttps://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=uc1.b3105814
856 4 0 _uhttps://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/76629
999 _c117354
_d117354