000 03747cam a22003493u 4500
001 77101
003 UtSlPG
005 20260610134803.0
006 m
007 cr n
008 260607r20251917utu|||||o|||||||||||||| d
040 _aUtSlPG
041 7 _aen
_2iso639-1
050 4 _aDA
100 1 _aFiggis, Darrell,
_d1882-1925
245 1 4 _aThe Gaelic State in the past & future
246 1 _aThe Gaelic State in the past and future : or, "The crown of a nation"
264 1 _aSalt Lake City, UT :
_bProject Gutenberg,
_c2025
300 _a1 online resource :
_bmultiple file formats
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
500 _aRelease date is 2025-10-20
505 0 _aThe purpose of the book -- The makings of a Polity -- The Polity and the State -- The working of the State -- The broken State -- The resurrection from the dead -- At the gates of the future -- Approaching problems.
508 _aJamie Brydone-Jack, Craig Kirkwood, and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net (This file was produced from images generously made available by The Internet Archive)
520 _a"The Gaelic State in the Past & Future; or, ''The Crown of a Nation''" by Darrell Figgis is a historical-political treatise written in the early 20th century. It argues that Ireland’s statehood should be rebuilt from its own historic polity—rooted in Brehon law, landholding tuatha, and functional assemblies—rather than borrowed from imperial or colonial models. Blending analysis and prescription, it reconstructs the workings of the old Gaelic State and outlines how its principles could be modernized into a sovereign, democratic framework. The opening of the work defines a “crowned” nation as one that expresses its spirit through its own State, then contends that Ireland once possessed such sovereignty and must rediscover it by studying its own history. Figgis traces the emergence of a centralized Gaelic polity from Tuathal and Cormac through Tara’s assemblies, the codification of law, and the layered organization of tuatha, brehons, elected kings, and public hospitallers, with land held corporately by the people. He explains how this system functioned, its social equity (including women’s legal standing), and its weaknesses—dynastic succession, disruptive provincial power, and the absence of a national army—which the Norman conquest froze before they could be resolved. He then surveys the broken state: invasion, partial Gaelicization of Norman lords, the Statutes of Kilkenny, Tudor reconquest, Hugh O’Neill’s bid to preserve the tuatha, Cromwellian dispossession, and the people’s quiet return to their lands beneath a landlord layer. The nineteenth-century “resurrection” follows: Emancipation, the Land War’s reassertion of the freeman’s right (including boycotting as a revival of communal sanction), cultural revival via the Gaelic League, and co‑operative societies as modern echoes of stateships. Finally, he turns to the future: discard English administrative molds, complete land purchase, and build a modern Irish State with a representative assembly anchored by specialized national councils (for farming, labour, law, education, defence) and a balancing senate—thus translating the old Gaelic polity into contemporary form. (This is an automatically generated summary.)
534 _pOriginally published:
_cDublin: Maunsel & Co., Ltd., 1917
653 _aIreland -- Politics and government
653 _aIrish question
856 4 _uhttps://archive.org/details/gaelicstateinpas00figguoft/page/n5/mode/2up
856 4 0 _uhttps://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/77101
999 _c117823
_d117823