000 03612cam a22003733u 4500
001 77146
003 UtSlPG
005 20260610134804.0
006 m
007 cr n
008 260607r20251913utu|||||o|||||||||||||| d
010 _a43029661
040 _aUtSlPG
041 7 _aen
_2iso639-1
050 4 _aBQ
100 1 _aDahlke, Paul,
_d1865-1928
245 1 0 _aBuddhism & science
246 1 _aBuddhism and science
264 1 _aSalt Lake City, UT :
_bProject Gutenberg,
_c2025
300 _a1 online resource :
_bmultiple file formats
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
500 _aRelease date is 2025-10-29
505 0 _aIntroduction -- What is a world-theory and is it necessary? -- Faith and a world-theory -- Science and a world-theory -- An introduction to the thought-world of the Buddha Gotama -- The doctrine of the Buddha -- Buddhism as a working hypothesis -- Buddhism and the problem of physics -- Buddhism and the problem of physiology -- Buddhism and the problem of biology -- Buddhism and the cosmological problem -- Buddhism and the problem of thought -- Conclusion.
508 _aSean/IB@DP
520 _a"Buddhism & science" by Paul Dahlke is a philosophical treatise written in the early 20th century. It argues that Buddhism provides a rigorous world-theory that surpasses both faith-based religion and mechanistic science by grounding meaning, morality, and knowledge in direct insight into actuality. The work develops a Buddhist account of causality, consciousness, karma, and rebirth, and sets this framework against questions in physics, biology, and cosmology. The opening of the treatise declares its purpose and audience: it seeks thinking readers dissatisfied with both dogmatic belief and purely technical science, and it frames three perennial questions—What am I? How should I act? To what end am I here? It contends that morality and religion must be functions of cognition, not mere emotion, and that neither faith (which posits a transcendent “adequate cause in itself”) nor science (which restricts itself to the sensible and the mechanical) can answer these questions. The author critiques faith as contrary to sense and ultimately selfish in motivation, and portrays science as amoral, limited to re-actual (measurable) processes, and incapable of providing existential support. He then introduces the Buddha’s “teaching of actuality,” situating it historically and linguistically, and emphasizing its radical, experiential grasp of transience and suffering. The doctrinal core begins by placing the Buddha between faith and science: all phenomena are conditioned (Sankhāra); living processes require real, non-sensible energies; individuality is an “in-force” (Kamma) expressed through the five aggregates and disclosed as consciousness, without a permanent self (anattā). With the Fire Sermon’s “all is burning” as motif, the text explains volitional action as a self-sustaining process, develops dependent arising, and presents rebirth as the continuity of Kamma via consciousness linking existences—beginningless, personal, and non-identical from life to life. (This is an automatically generated summary.)
534 _pOriginally published:
_cLondon: Macmillan and Co., 1913
653 _aScience -- Philosophy
653 _aBuddhism and science
700 1 _aSīlāchāra, Bhikkhu,
_d1871-1951
856 4 _uhttps://archive.org/details/buddhismscience00dahl/page/n5/mode/2up
856 4 0 _uhttps://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/77146
999 _c117868
_d117868