000 02875cam a22003493u 4500
001 77753
003 UtSlPG
005 20260610134812.0
006 m
007 cr n
008 260607r20261922utu|||||o|||||||||||||| d
010 _asg22000139
040 _aUtSlPG
041 7 _aen
_2iso639-1
050 4 _aHB
100 1 _aCarr-Saunders, A. M.
_q(Alexander Morris),
_d1886-1966
245 1 4 _aThe population problem
264 1 _aSalt Lake City, UT :
_bProject Gutenberg,
_c2026
300 _a1 online resource :
_bmultiple file formats
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
500 _aRelease date is 2026-01-23
508 _aRichard Tonsing, Aaron Adrignola, Tim Lindell, and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net (This file was produced from images generously made available by The Internet Archive/American Libraries.)
520 _aThe population problem by A. M. Carr-Saunders is a scientific treatise written in the early 20th century. It examines population through both quantitative (numbers, growth, resources) and qualitative (heredity, evolution, eugenics) lenses, framing modern concerns within a broad biological and historical perspective. The work aims to connect economic debates with evolutionary theory, surveying how customs, institutions, and biological factors shape fertility and human development. The opening of the work sets out its wartime origins, ambitious scope, and method: to view population questions historically and evolutionarily, and to relate issues of numbers and quality to a common biological basis. It then offers a brisk historical survey from Plato and Roman writers to mercantilists and early economists, culminating in Malthus’s influence, the heated reception of his ideas, early neo-Malthusian advocacy, and the decisive impact on Darwin and Wallace. The text next lays biological groundwork: explaining sexual reproduction, gametes, and fertilization; showing that among animals most ripe ova are fertilized due to vast sperm production and strong sexual instincts; and sketching reflex, instinct, and elementary intelligence. It concludes, for the opening portion, that animal reproduction is essentially “mechanical” (fecundity ≈ realized fertility), whereas in humans conceptual thought and socially shaped practices (e.g., abstinence, abortion, infanticide, sexual customs) intervene, creating a gap between innate fecundity and actual fertility. (This is an automatically generated summary.)
534 _pOriginally published:
_cOxford: Clarendon Press, 1922
653 _aPopulation
653 _aHuman evolution
653 _aFertility, Human
856 4 _uhttps://archive.org/details/populationproble00carr/page/n5/mode/2up
856 4 0 _uhttps://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/77753
999 _c118473
_d118473