000 03276cam a22003253u 4500
001 77846
003 UtSlPG
005 20260610134814.0
006 m
007 cr n
008 260607r20261912utu|||||o|||||||||||||| d
040 _aUtSlPG
041 7 _afr
_2iso639-1
050 4 _aDT
100 1 _aDelafosse, Maurice,
_d1870-1926
245 1 0 _aHaut-Sénégal-Niger (Soudan français), Tome 3 (de 3): les civilisations
264 1 _aSalt Lake City, UT :
_bProject Gutenberg,
_c2026
300 _a1 online resource :
_bmultiple file formats
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
500 _aRelease date is 2026-02-03
508 _aGalo Flordelis (This file was produced from images generously made available by the HathiTrust Digital Library)
520 _a"Haut-Sénégal-Niger (Soudan français), Tome 3 (de 3): les civilisations" by Maurice Delafosse is a scholarly ethnographic study written in the early 20th century. It surveys the civilizations of the French Soudan through their customary institutions—civil, social, political, and religious—with special attention to land tenure, property, family organization, and inheritance. The volume contrasts indigenous customary law with Islamic (Maliki) principles and French administrative practice, aiming to present the underlying spirit of local customs rather than a rigid code. The opening of the volume defines “civilization” broadly and argues that Sudanese societies possess coherent systems of custom worth systematic study, while noting that Islamic law is only partially adopted and that codifying customs would be misleading. Delafosse sets a method: avoid forcing European legal terms onto indigenous notions and extract guiding principles instead. He then outlines land tenure among sedentary and nomadic groups: all land has an owner (the community or its chief as administrator), families hold usufruct rights to cultivate, alienation of soil is rare and collective consent is required, and a public domain (waterways, paths, markets, sacred spaces) carries shared obligations. He contrasts this with Maliki law, which can recognize private ownership from first occupation, but notes its limited local application; he also cautions colonial authorities about concessions that ignore existing rights. Moving to movable property, he states that the products of labor (crops, buildings, tools, herds) are true private or collective property, details family property and administration, women’s parallel rights of possession, and practical rules for marks of ownership, found goods, and stray animals. Finally, he sketches succession: general rules for heirs and widows, limits on testaments, and three main systems—uterine (maternal-line), consanguine (paternal-line), and patriarchal—often with the patriarchal rule governing family property even where private estates follow other logics. (This is an automatically generated summary.)
534 _pOriginally published:
_cParis: Émile Larose, 1912
653 _aMali
700 1 _aClozel, F.-J.
_q(François-Joseph),
_d1860-1918
856 4 _uhttps://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/000846957
856 4 0 _uhttps://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/77846
999 _c118566
_d118566