000 03000cam a22003253u 4500
001 78460
003 UtSlPG
005 20260610134823.0
006 m
007 cr n
008 260607r20261911utu|||||o|||||||||||||| d
010 _a11013153
040 _aUtSlPG
041 7 _aen
_2iso639-1
050 4 _aHD
100 1 _aAnonymous
245 1 4 _aThe great oil octopus
264 1 _aSalt Lake City, UT :
_bProject Gutenberg,
_c2026
300 _a1 online resource :
_bmultiple file formats
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
500 _aRelease date is 2026-04-16
508 _adeaurider, Daniel Lowe, and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net (This file was produced from images generously made available by The Internet Archive)
520 _a"The great oil octopus" by Anonymous is an investigative exposé written in the early 20th century. It probes the rise and global reach of the Standard Oil Trust, alleging that its monopoly was forged through secret railway rebates, discriminatory freight rates, control of terminals and pipelines, espionage, intimidation, and systematic bribery. The work profiles leading figures such as John D. Rockefeller, H. H. Rogers, and J. D. Archbold, and maps a dense web of domestic and foreign subsidiaries that extend the Trust’s power. The opening of this exposé sets its purpose: to gather scattered evidence into a clear account of Standard Oil’s methods at home and abroad. After a vivid scene of the Trust’s imposing London headquarters and brief portraits of its principals, the author inventories the Standard Oil Company of New Jersey and a sprawling network of refining, lubricating, pipeline, tank car, gas, and marketing companies worldwide. The narrative then establishes the core mechanism of dominance—the secret rebate—recounting Cleveland refiners’ discoveries, Congressional testimony, and the 1872 South Improvement Company contracts that granted drawbacks, shipment data, and protective rate manipulations. Subsequent early chapters show how these advantages fueled rapid buyouts in Cleveland, covert control of New York harbor terminals, and published “equalization” rates that penalized independent shipping points; they also describe the quiet birth of the trust structure, enforced secrecy agreements, evasive or false testimony, and documented bribery via the Archbold letters to senators, judges, and editors. The section closes with cases of obstruction and force against rival pipelines and the Buffalo lubricating oil affair, where attempted sabotage and conspiracy charges surfaced alongside civil settlements. (This is an automatically generated summary.)
534 _pOriginally published:
_cLondon: T. Fisher Unwin, 1911
653 _aStandard Oil Company
856 4 _uhttps://archive.org/details/greatoiloctopus00trutrich
856 4 0 _uhttps://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/78460
999 _c119179
_d119179