000 02884cam a22003493u 4500
001 78616
003 UtSlPG
005 20260610134825.0
006 m
007 cr n
008 260607r20261927utu|||||o|||||||||||||| d
010 _a27016967
040 _aUtSlPG
041 7 _aen
_2iso639-1
050 4 _aBF
100 1 _aBurrow, Trigant,
_d1875-1950
245 1 4 _aThe social basis of consciousness
264 1 _aSalt Lake City, UT :
_bProject Gutenberg,
_c2026
300 _a1 online resource :
_bmultiple file formats
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
500 _aRelease date is 2026-05-06
508 _aSean (@parchmentglow)
520 _a"The social basis of consciousness" by Trigant Burrow is a psychological treatise written in the early 20th century. It advances an organismic, societal account of consciousness and the neuroses, arguing that what we call “normality” masks a collective unconscious, and that genuine mental health requires replacing individualistic, authoritarian analysis with shared, organic participation in a broader, relative consciousness. The opening of this treatise traces the author’s shift from orthodox psychoanalysis to a more inclusive, impersonal approach born of a role-reversal with a student who analyzed him, revealing that analyst and patient alike enact authoritarian, personally biased “resistances.” The Preface frames this as the genesis of group-based experimentation and a rejection of theory-as-authority. The Introduction honors Freud’s insights but contends that psychoanalysis, as commonly practiced, is personalistic suggestion that mistakes theory for life and ignores the societal unconscious; it calls for abrogating the “personal equation” and adopting an organismic, relative standpoint. Chapter I argues that modern “sexuality” is a substitutive symptom distinct from the organic instinct of sex, that normal social adaptation is as neurotic as individual neurosis, and that technique-driven, objective “systems” cannot touch subjective feeling; the analyst must analyze himself, reject normality’s compromises, and meet life directly. Early in Chapter II, the work proposes a “relativity of consciousness,” critiquing the observer’s absolute, image-based (bidimensional) stance and urging tridimensional participation in a common affective life; Chapter III begins extending this relativity principle to individual development. (This is an automatically generated summary.)
534 _pOriginally published:
_cNew York: Harcourt, Brace and Company, Inc., 1927
653 _aConsciousness
653 _aPsychoanalysis
653 _aNeuroses
856 4 _uhttps://archive.org/details/socialbasisofcon0000burr/page/n7/mode/2up
856 4 0 _uhttps://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/78616
999 _c119334
_d119334