000 02537cam a22003133u 4500
001 37370
003 UtSlPG
005 20260610133842.0
006 m
007 cr n
008 260607r2011||||utu|||||o|||||||||||||| d
010 _a31009988
040 _aUtSlPG
041 7 _aen
_2iso639-1
050 4 _aBL
100 1 _aCalderwood, Henry,
_d1830-1897
245 1 4 _aThe Relations of Science and Religion :
_bThe Morse Lecture, 1880
264 1 _aSalt Lake City, UT :
_bProject Gutenberg,
_c2011
300 _a1 online resource :
_bmultiple file formats
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
500 _aRelease date is 2011-09-09
508 _aProduced by Curtis Weyant, Leonard Johnson and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net (This file was produced from images generously made available by Case Western Reserve University Preservation Department Digital Library)
520 _a"The Relations of Science and Religion" by Henry Calderwood is a scholarly work that examines the intersection between scientific and religious thought, likely written in the late 19th century. In this treatise, Calderwood aims to explore the compatibility and potential harmony between the findings of modern science and the tenets of Christianity, particularly those as articulated in the Bible. He addresses the common perception of conflict between the two realms and proposes a constructive dialogue that respects the methodologies and truths inherent in both. The opening of the text establishes Calderwood's intent to foster understanding and bridge divides between scientific inquiry and religious belief. He acknowledges the significant advances in science during his era and discusses the challenges of reconciling such advancements with religious perspectives. Emphasizing that both science and religion seek rational foundations, he sets the stage to explore how modern scientific discoveries can coexist with and even support religious concepts. right from the outset, it is clear that Calderwood is advocating for a collaborative approach, suggesting that the true nature of scientific progress does not necessarily negate the validity of spiritual beliefs, but rather calls for a reevaluation of how these two fields interact. (This is an automatically generated summary.)
534 _nOriginal publication data not identified
653 _aReligion and science
856 4 0 _uhttps://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/37370
999 _c78210
_d78210