000			02706cam a22003133u 4500
001			38099
003			UtSlPG
005			20260610133853.0
006			m
007			cr n
008			260607r2011||||utu|||||o|||||||||||||| d
040			_aUtSlPG
041		7	_aen _2iso639-1
050		4	_aBL
100	1		_aIngersoll, Robert Green, _d1833-1899
245	1	0	_aMistakes of Moses
264		1	_aSalt Lake City, UT : _bProject Gutenberg, _c2011
300			_a1 online resource : _bmultiple file formats
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
500			_aRelease date is 2011-11-22
505	0		_aPreface -- Some mistakes of Moses -- Free schools -- The politicians -- Man and woman -- The Pentateuch -- Monday -- Tuesday -- Wednesday -- Thursday -- "He made the stars also" -- Friday -- Saturday -- Let us make man -- Sunday -- The necessity for a good memory -- The garden -- The fall -- Dampness -- Bacchus and Babel -- Faith in filth -- The Hebrews -- The plagues -- The flight -- Confess and avoid -- "Inspired" slavery -- "Inspired" marriage -- "Inspired" war -- "Inspired" religious liberty -- Conclusion.
508			_aProduced by David Widger
520			_a"Mistakes of Moses" by Robert Green Ingersoll is a critical examination of the biblical texts, specifically focusing on the Pentateuch, written in the late 19th century. The book offers a rationalist perspective on religious doctrines, questioning the historical and moral validity of the teachings attributed to Moses and the divine inspiration of scripture. Ingersoll argues against the inerrancy of the Bible, highlighting its inconsistencies and outdated views that conflict with modern science and ethical standards. The opening of the work introduces Ingersoll's long-standing view that the Pentateuch is a collection of barbaric laws that cannot be rightly attributed to an infallible divine author. He outlines his intention to illustrate the errors and contradictions within these texts, arguing that they reflect the primitive beliefs of ancient cultures rather than genuine divine revelations. Ingersoll asserts the importance of reason and independent thought in understanding moral truths, advocating for individual exploration of ideas over blind adherence to tradition or religious dogma. The tone is both critical and passionate, setting the stage for a thorough exploration of what Ingersoll sees as the fallibility of religious texts and their interpretation. (This is an automatically generated summary.)
534			_nOriginal publication data not identified
653			_aFree thought
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/38099
999			_c78939 _d78939