000 02538cam a22003133u 4500
001 38810
003 UtSlPG
005 20260610133904.0
006 m
007 cr n
008 260607r2012||||utu|||||o|||||||||||||| d
040 _aUtSlPG
041 7 _aen
_2iso639-1
050 4 _aBL
100 1 _aIngersoll, Robert Green,
_d1833-1899
245 1 4 _aThe Works of Robert G. Ingersoll, Vol. 10 (of 12) :
_bDresden Edition—Legal
264 1 _aSalt Lake City, UT :
_bProject Gutenberg,
_c2012
300 _a1 online resource :
_bmultiple file formats
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
500 _aRelease date is 2012-02-09
505 0 _aAddress to the jury in the Munn trial -- Closing address to the jury in the first Star-route trial -- Opening address to the jury in the second Star-route trial -- Closing address in second Star-route trial -- Address to the jury in the Davis will case -- Argument before the Vice-Chancellor in the Russell case.
508 _aProduced by David Widger
520 _a"The Works of Robert G. Ingersoll, Vol. 10 (of 12)" by Robert Green Ingersoll is a legal anthology written in the late 19th century. This volume showcases Ingersoll's powerful oratory and legal arguments presented during significant trials of his time, emphasizing themes related to justice, morality, and the flaws of the legal system. It includes detailed addresses to juries in high-profile cases, articulating a defense strategy that stresses the importance of integrity and character in legal proceedings. The opening of this volume introduces a closing address to the jury in the Munn trial, where Ingersoll passionately argues for the innocence of the defendant, Daniel W. Munn. He highlights the prejudices associated with the distilling industry and critiques the testimony of the prosecution's key witness, Jacob Rehm, whom he characterizes as unreliable and self-serving. Ingersoll emphasizes the value of good character, urging the jury to rely on substantive evidence rather than the sensationalism of the case or the questionable integrity of certain witnesses. His argument invokes deep considerations of justice and the moral responsibilities of jurors, aiming to persuade them of Munn's innocence based solely on the evidence presented. (This is an automatically generated summary.)
534 _nOriginal publication data not identified
653 _aFree thought
856 4 0 _uhttps://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/38810
999 _c79649
_d79649